Matt Pilsner > June 14, 2009
A Bridge in Lawrenceville.
This is a shot I took about a week ago, but it's been sitting in my "to do box" since then.  I felt that it had some potential, but it needed something extra.  After many different PP approaches, I still don't think I hit it in on the mark.  It was taken at f/7.1, and that's what bothers me about it.  Believe it or not, I want less DoF in it, so that only the bolts on the left are sharp.
P.S. This is also a mirror image of the original shot.
Matt Pilsner > April 12, 2009
I went for a short walk by the canal today.  I was hoping to catch a shot of some interesting fishermen or a duck.  There wasn't anything exciting, so I took this shot of the sky through a tree.  The dark blue, mysterious look is mostly PP.
Matt Pilsner > July 31, 2008
Make a Caption for me.  I'm not in a funny mood, but I bet some of you can come up with some funny captions for this shot.

I went for a walk this morning by the canal, and I happened to find these birds under a bridge in a nest.
Matt Pilsner > May 30, 2008
I went for a 3½ mile walk on the towpath by the D&R Canal in Princeton yesterday.  There wasn't any interesting wildlife to photograph like the last time I went out on the path. 

This is a shot of the handrail on the bridge where we finally decided to turn around.  I took about 6 shots of these bolts.  Each one had a different bolt in focus, but I found this one most eye-catching.

Hillary, I don't have any caterpilars in my shot, but how do you like my little corner of bokeh?
Matt Pilsner > Daily Photos 2009 photo
Matt Pilsner > Daily Photos 2009 photo
Matt Pilsner > I was waiting for the Dinky train to go by, but after about 30 mins, I gave up.
Matt Pilsner > This is the shot I took right after I discovered that my sepia settings were still on.  I also threw my polarizer on for this one.
Matt Pilsner > Daily Photos 2009 photo
June 14, 2009
A Bridge in Lawrenceville.
This is a shot I took about a week ago, but it's been sitting in my "to do box" since then. I felt that it had some potential, but it needed something extra. After many different PP approaches, I still don't think I hit it in on the mark. It was taken at f/7.1, and that's what bothers me about it. Believe it or not, I want less DoF in it, so that only the bolts on the left are sharp.
P.S. This is also a mirror image of the original shot.
Matt Pilsner > June 14, 2009
A Bridge in Lawrenceville.
This is a shot I took about a week ago, but it's been sitting in my "to do box" since then.  I felt that it had some potential, but it needed something extra.  After many different PP approaches, I still don't think I hit it in on the mark.  It was taken at f/7.1, and that's what bothers me about it.  Believe it or not, I want less DoF in it, so that only the bolts on the left are sharp.
P.S. This is also a mirror image of the original shot.
June 14, 2009
A Bridge in Lawrenceville.
This is a shot I took about a week ago, but it's been sitting in my "to do box" since then. I felt that it had some potential, but it needed something extra. After many different PP approaches, I still don't think I hit it in on the mark. It was taken at f/7.1, and that's what bothers me about it. Believe it or not, I want less DoF in it, so that only the bolts on the left are sharp.
P.S. This is also a mirror image of the original shot.
See photo in gallery

Comments

|

New comment:

Name: Email: Link:


To foil spammers, enter this code: copy this text in this box: Code unreadable?



All Images On This Website © Matt Pilsner. All Rights Reserved.

Images may not be downloaded, copied, or reproduced without written consent from Matt Pilsner.